The central government is not in favor of declaring marital rape a crime

The central government’s response at the Supreme Court on marital rape: a social issue rather than a legal one

New Delhi: The Central government has filed its reply in the Supreme Court on the marital rape case, in which it has disagreed with the recognition of this crime. The government says that there are adequate remedies available in other laws for women who are victims of marital rape. The Center said that this issue is more social than legal and was placed by Parliament after careful consideration during the 2013 amendments to the IPC. The central government argued that abolishing the exception would have a serious impact on the institution of marriage.

Central government’s statement in Supreme Court: Abolishing the exception of Section 375 on marital rape will have a deep impact on the institution of marriage

The Central government has told the Supreme Court that abolishing Exception 2 of Section 375 of the IPC would have a far-reaching impact on the institution of marriage. The government warned that this could cause serious disruption in marital relations. The Center also pointed out that “in the rapidly growing and constantly changing social and family structure, misuse of the amended provisions cannot be ruled out.” This would mean that it would become difficult and challenging for a person to prove consent.

The Centre cautioned the Supreme Court about the “far-reaching socio-legal implications” of criminalising marital rape, and urged the court to take a broader view beyond the strict legal framework. In an affidavit submitted to the Supreme Court, the Centre argued that any judicial review on the issue must acknowledge the wider social consequences and the stand of Parliament.

Centre’s affidavit

The affidavit is filed in response to multiple petitions challenging the constitutionality of the marital rape exception under Indian law, which exempts a husband from being prosecuted for rape if the wife is of age. The provision, which was originally contained in Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), was retained in its successor law, the Indian Justice Code (BNS), enacted earlier this year. Under Section 375 of the now-repealed IPC, a man was exempt from being charged with rape if the victim was his wife and not a minor. The BNS, which comes into force in July 2023, retains this exemption, now under Section 63. The provision has faced legal challenges from multiple petitioners who argue that it discriminates against married women by depriving them of legal protection against sexual assault by their husbands.

Jatin Singh

Recent Posts

Understand the Supreme Intelligence -Adi Parashakti

Adi Parashakti: From Formless Eternity to Manifest Divinity In the vast spiritual expanse of Hindu philosophy, Adi Parashakti is the…

3 months ago

Top 10 Bollywood Actresses ever

Bollywood has traditionally been a male-dominated industry, where an actor’s job is to carry a film on his shoulders and…

3 months ago

Madhuri Dixit Nene – 10 Modern Bollywood Songs She Could Have Done Even Better

Mumbai, Humari Baat – In Bollywood, there’s grace, there’s style, and then there’s Madhuri Dixit Nene — a living legend…

3 months ago

Arun Sood Leads Delegation to DC for Smooth Organization of Ramleela, Dussehra & Diwali in Chandigarh

Various organizations led by Arun Sood met the Deputy Commissioner for successful organization of the upcoming Ramlila, Dussehra, Diwali festivals…

3 months ago

Top 10 Marble Companies in India – 2025 Edition

India’s Leading Names in Marble, Tiles, and Natural Stone Solutions India’s architecture and construction industry has always had a deep-rooted…

5 months ago

Decoding the True Meaning of Parvati, Lakshmi & Sarasvati: A Sanskrit-Based Reinterpretation of Divine Feminine Names

Decoding the True Meaning of Parvati, Lakshmi & Sarasvati: A Sanskrit-Based Reinterpretation of Divine Feminine Names 🌺 Introduction The name…

5 months ago

This website uses cookies.